Texas Gov. Introduces “School and Firearm Safety Action Plan”

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestyoutube

Texas Gov. recently released his “Action Plan” in response to the Santa Fe incident. READ MORE

Gov. Abbott

SOURCE: texas.gov.com, AP

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced a 44-page plan intended to keep schools safer. The focus is on increased law enforcement presence, more armed school personnel, better threat assessment, and better mental health interventions.

“This plan is a starting point, not an ending place,” said Governor Abbott. “It provides strategies that can be used before the next school year begins to keep our students safe when they return to school. This plan will make our schools safer and our communities safer.”

Abbott’s “School Firearm Safety Action Plan” resulted from a series of roundtable discussions hosted by the governor following the Sante Fe TX shooting on May 19.

The primary focus for the recommendations are on school security, but also suggests 5 firearm-specific measures, including fortifying criminal reporting that might influence NICS background check.

The plan also addresses Texas’ Safe Firearm Storage Law, which has recently come under scrutiny. Currently, the law only allows prosecution of parents for what’s deemed unsafe storage if their child is under 17 years of age. This absolved the father of the Santa Fe shooter from liability.

Abbott seeks to raise the age to 18, and increasing the penalty level to a 3rd-degree felony when access results in death or serious bodily injury, plus seeks to remove the “readily dischargeable” statutory definition.

The plan also encourages the state legislature to “consider the merits” of allowing courts to issue “red flag” or “extreme risk” protective orders. This would allow law enforcement, a district attorney, a school employee, or a family member to file a petition seeking the removal of firearms from a person suspected to be dangerous to himself or to others. Governor Abbott insists that such a law must follow due process by providing the person both a notice and a hearing, and that any such protective order would be for a limited duration of time, provide for mental health treatment, and offer a clear path to the full restoration of rights and return of firearms when the person is no longer deemed to be a danger.

Regarding proposed school measures: the plan outlines several measures which include increasing law enforcement presence, implementing behavior threat assessment programs, addressing the means to provide more secure school infrastructure, and active shooter and emergency response training.

Abbott’s “Action Plan” includes a section outlining how the school marshal program might be expanded, and also provide training that focuses more on firearms use. This program allows school districts to identify and train personnel, including teachers, to respond to active shooter situations with firearms. Under current law, school marshals who have direct contact with students are required to store their firearm while on campus, making the weapon hard to access and use in the event of a crisis. The proposal seeks to change this and allow marshals to keep their firearms on their person.

Abbott says he has identified nearly $110 million in total funding, including $70 million that is already or will soon be available.

READ Gov. Abbott’s proposal HERE

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

5 thoughts on “Texas Gov. Introduces “School and Firearm Safety Action Plan””

  1. I cannot be the only one! In all the discussion regarding school shootings and measures to protect students and staff I have not heard much, if any, talk about controlling access to school buildings.

    Limit access to one door, screen everyone with metal detection devices in the presence of armed police.
    Egress points should be alarmed and monitored by video surveillance Teachers do not not to be armed, they want to teach.

    Maybe I am missing something here but I feel it bears discussion.

  2. I thought the initial response to the Sant Fe shooting was reducing the entrances to school grounds and fortifying security. I see no mention of that in this plan. I see the ‘red flag warning’ as a potential for confiscation based on unsubstantiated grounds and ripe for abuse. I would also like to know who was invited to this round table discussion.

  3. The Governor has a few decent ideas, but most would still not effect or do anything for the criminal or person planning the murders, as he, nor anyone seems to be able to isolate the person planning the crime.
    And some of his ideas are already addressed and in the program that the NRA has had out, for years, to help schools and others try to offset criminal attacks. However that will never be mentioned by the governor or others.
    The only way, that they might stop school murders by other students or a outsider entering, is monitoring students and guests into the school via programs like TSA does at airports and security does at Federal buildings. Search, enter and stay inside until classes are let out for the day.

  4. I cannot help but believe that we can make schools safer without turning them into prisons. If a potential school shooter knew that any adult in the school might be armed, I strongly suspect that many would reconsider. If the promise of instant fame were removed it would halp as well.

    1. Guy Smith is on the right track. The essential key that all mass shootings have in common is MOTIVE. Every single one of these shooters, from Chapman forward, sought one thing, FAME, or, more to the point, INFAMY. Every one of these people wanted to “go out in a blaze of glory,” and have their name on every news outlet, and thereby, every tongue in the world. The simplest solution would be to have a “gentleman’s agreement” between all news and internet outlets not to broadcast ANY news whatsoever about such shootings, and most especially not to use the shooters name or image. If we could remove any mention of such occurrences on the internet, we could deprive these sick individuals of the notoriety they seek, and thereby the motive for committing the crime.
      Like it or not, we live in an electronically inter-connected “cult of personality,” and unfortunately there are those among us who are more than willing to trade another’s life away in order to have their 15 minutes of fame. If we remove the reward, then these occurrences would, eventually, cease.

Comments are closed.