Do You Have the Right to Stand Your Ground?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestyoutube

How clear are “stand your ground” laws? Jason Hanson shares his thoughts. KEEP READING

crime scene

by Jason Hanson

On July 19, 2018, Markeis McGlockton was shot and killed outside a convenience store in Clearwater, Florida, after a confrontation with a legally armed citizen.

The man who shot him was identified as Michael Drejka, who McGlockton shoved to the ground for confronting McGlockton’s girlfriend over a parking space.

Initially, Drejka was not arrested because the Pinellas County sheriff stated that “stand your ground” law applies to this case since Drejka feared a further attack after being shoved to the ground.

After a review of the case by Florida State Attorney Bernie McCabe, Drejka, 48, was charged with manslaughter and booked into the Pinellas County Jail. His bail was set at $100,000.

A Matter of Seconds
You’ve probably seen the surveillance video of this incident all over the news. According to law enforcement, there were four–five seconds between Drejka hitting the ground and him firing the deadly shot.

In addition, detectives estimated the men were about 10 feet apart. Here’s the thing. McGlockton no doubt violently shoved Drejka to the ground. In the video, it appears McGlockton did not back away after shoving Drejka until he saw the gun.

This begs the following questions: Could McGlockton have seriously injured or killed Drejka if he continued attacking him? He could have. Even though Drejka was shoved to the ground, was McGlockton still a threat? Maybe. Was Drejka truly in fear for his life? He says so.

The thing is we could talk “what ifs” about this case all day, but the fact remains that one man is dead and another’s life is devastated over a parking spot and a shove to the ground.

While this case will play out for a long time to come, I want to share with you the basic elements of stand your ground laws and the “castle doctrine,” which relates to protecting yourself at home.

Protect Your Person
Remember, I’m not a lawyer and I’m only stating my thoughts regarding these types of laws. You should always consult with an attorney in your state regarding these laws.

One of the most well-known states with a stand your ground law is Florida because of the case mentioned above and similar cases such as the Trayvon Martin shooting.

Many states have laws similar to Florida’s, which basically states a person is justified in using deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to themselves or others. It also states a person does not have a duty to retreat as long as they are in a place where they have the right to be.

So if we use this definition to examine the case above, both men were in a place they had the right to be. The question that remains is did Drejka reasonably believe that he had to use deadly force to prevent death or bodily harm to himself? Imagine if you were Drejka. He was forcefully shoved to the ground, he was probably afraid, his heart was pounding — what would you do?

On the other hand, could Drejka have simply stood up and walked away from McGlockton? Was McGlockton going to pursue him? Obviously, these are answers that will play out in court.

However, the key thing to remember is that you have to believe the person is still a threat to justify using deadly force.

Protect Your Property
In addition to “stand your ground,” another controversial law is the “castle doctrine”. Many states have some type of castle doctrine law, which says a person has the legal right to defend themselves with the use of deadly force against an intruder in their home or other property.

Under this legal theory, the homeowner is not required to retreat, but may stand their ground to defend themselves, their home or their property. Now, this law is more straightforward than stand your ground because it’s pretty reasonable that every person should be able to defend his or her family from an intruder in their home.

In other words, if someone is inside your home, they are committing a crime and you have every right to protect your family.

However, one of the times this law was disputed was in the 2014 case of a Montana man named Markus Kaarma, who shot a young man in his garage. Kaarma had been the victim of a home burglary, so he stayed up at night in case the burglars came back.

Prosecutors argued that Kaarma lured the young man into the garage by leaving it open and that Markus was staying up all night to enact revenge for the previous burglary. The young man who died was committing a crime when he entered the garage, but the jury decided the homeowner deliberately lured the young man there before he killed him.

The Bottom Line
These types of laws will always be contested and are easily affected by our political climate. But what it really comes down to is common sense: Is the person still a threat, and can they still kill you?

If someone kicks in your door at 3:00 a.m. and runs at you in your house, then by all means they’re a threat. But if someone tries to kick in your door at 3:00 a.m. and you yell that you’ve got a gun and they take off down the street… Don’t go chasing them and shoot them in the back because they’re no longer a threat.

WHAT YOU YOU THINK?

Jason Hanson is a former CIA Officer and New York Times bestselling author of Spy Secrets That Can Save Your Life. To get a free copy of his book, visit www.SpyEscape.com.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

4 thoughts on “Do You Have the Right to Stand Your Ground?”

  1. I’d be more concerned that someone might come at me when getting out of my car or shortly after getting out of my car after coming home late at night It takes me a couple of minutes just to get out of my car.

  2. VERY INTERESTING QUESTION AS WELL!! I AM A WRONGFULLY CONVICTED FELON, NON-VIOLENT, ONLY EVIDENCE SHOWS LAW ENFORCEMENT, INSURANCE COMPANIES, BREAKING LAW OVER 80 TIMES, ME NOT ONCE! NO MIRANDA, NO FINGERPRINTS”BUT THERE IS A SIGNED DOCUMENT THAT SAYS THERE WERE,I AM TAKING A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO COURT THIS TIME, IF I CAN GET THEM INTO COURT, THE LYING SCUM THAT PRODUCED DOCUMENT, WILL HAVE TO PRODUCE NONEXISTANT PRINTS, PICS”,NO MUG SHOT, NEVER CUFFED, BAIL SET,PAID.NO EVIDENCE AGAINST ME FOR GRAND JURY, LOTS AGAINST PEOPLE TESTIFYING AGAINST ME.I CAN NOT VOTE,I CAN NOT HAVE WEAPONS USING GUNPOWDER”THERE ARE FAR BETTER/MORE EXPENSIVE PROPELLANTS”. JUST FOR ARGUMENT, ONE OF MY CROSSBOWS TRAVELS AT 450 FT, PER SECOND! THAT IS ONE AND A HALF FOOTBALL FIELDS IN A SECOND, WILL GO THROUGH A MAN WEARING A VEST,PROBABLY PARTLY THE SECOND IF BEHIND HIM.WITH NON-POWDER PROPELLANT, THROUGH AT LEAST 3 MEN PRODUCING A HOLE THEY COULD NOT SAVE THEIR LIVES.IF , IF SHOT IN ER! WERE I ALLOWED TO BE ARMED ON MY OWN GROUND OR CAR,POSSIBLY WE COULD TALK. BUT THEM KNOWING I AM FELON,NOT KNOWING I HAD LEGAL NON GUNPOWDER AMMO.IT IS INSTANTLY THEM GOING FOR GUNS TO KILL ME.MY CASE SHOULD MAKE NATIONAL NEWS,THE FIRST 4 FEDERAL CASES,THE JUDGES DID NOT READ EVIDENCE,BUT BELIEVED EVERY LIE TOLD BY OTHER SIDE,ARE HEADED FOR ANDERSON ALBERT/R.IC.O THAT DOES NOT SOUND BAD,BUT DUE TO THE FACTS SHOWING THE JUDGES GUILTY,THEY HAVE TO REPAYEVERY CENT!!! EVER EARNED FROM ANY GOVERNMENT,LOOSE RETIREMENT/HEALTH CARE,GO TO PRISON.I HONESTLY FEEL SORRY FOR THEIR FAMILIES.I HAD OVER $300,000. WORTH OF STUFF STOLEN WHILE LOCKED UP.HAVE VIDEOSTATEMENTS,FINGER PRINTS,MUCH MUCH MORE.THEY WOULD NOT EVEN INVESTIGATE,,14TH AMENDMENT VIOLATION,MALFESANCE OF OFFICE R.I.C.O. THE POINT IS INSTEAD OF PUTTING A PEACEFUL MAN IN A SITUATION;;WHERE HE MUST KILL OR BE KILLED IS A STUPID THING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. Please read the summation of the Trayvon Martin shooting by Massad Ayoob. S/b available at American Handgunner website.
    In it, he states that Florida’s stand your ground law was never brought up in the courtroom. This was a case of murderous assault. How long could Martin pound Zimmerman’s head into the sidewalk before Zimmerman died?

Comments are closed.